Acesso aberto a publicações científicas

Abaixo listamos referências e material utilizado na aula para discussão sobre:

• História das publicações científicas

• Tipos de acesso aberto à publicações: ouro (golden open access), verde (green open access), diamante (diamond open access

• Políticas de acesso aberto

• Papel dos Preprints

• Processo de revisão por pares

Publicações em acesso aberto

Bezjak et al. (2018). Open Science Training Handbook (1.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1212496

Brembs, B., Huneman, P., Schönbrodt, F., Nilsonne, G., Susi, T., Siems, R., Perakakis, P., Trachana, V., Ma, L., & Rodriguez-Cuadrado, S. (2023). Replacing academic journals. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7643806

Bruno de Pierro. (2019). Comunicação científica sem barreiras. Pesquisa FAPESP, 276. https://revistapesquisa.fapesp.br/comunicacao-cientifica-sem-barreiras/

Buranyi, S. (2017, June 27). Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science? The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-business-scientific-publishing-bad-for-science

DAFNEE, a Database of Academia Friendly jourNals in Ecology and Evolution. (n.d.). Retrieved May 8, 2023, from https://dafnee.isem-evolution.fr/

Else, H. (2018). How Unpaywall is transforming open science. Nature, 560(7718), 290–291. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-05968-3

Kowaltowski, A. J., Arruda, J. R. F., Nussenzveig, P., & Silber, A. (2023, March 9). Article Processing Charges are a Heavy Burden for Middle-Income Countries. The Scholarly Kitchen. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2023/03/09/guest-post-article-processing-charges-are-a-heavy-burden-for-middle-income-countries/

Kowaltowski, A., Naslavsky, M., & Zatz, M. (2022). Open access: Brazilian scientists denied waivers and discounts. Nature, 603(7903), 793–793. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-00864-3

Kwon, D. (2022). Open-access publishing fees deter researchers in the global south. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-00342-w

Pereira, C. C., Fernandes, G. F., & Siqueira, W. K. (2023, August 3). Cuidado com a malandragem acadêmica! Sobrevivendo na Ciência. https://marcoarmello.wordpress.com/2023/08/03/pereira2023/

Pereira, et al. (2023). Beware of scientific scams! Hints to avoid predatory publishing in biological journals. Neotropical Biology and Conservation, 18(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3897/neotropical.18.e108887

Piwowar, H., Priem, J., Larivière, V., Alperin, J. P., Matthias, L., Norlander, B., Farley, A., West, J., & Haustein, S. (2018). The state of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ, 6, e4375. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4375

Racimo, F., Galtier, N., De Herde, V., Aubert Bonn, N., Phillips, B., Guillemaud, T., & Bourget, D. (2022). Ethical Publishing: How Do We Get There? Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3998/ptpbio.3363

Tennant, J. P., Waldner, F., Jacques, D. C., Masuzzo, P., Collister, L. B., & Hartgerink, C. H. J. (2016). The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: An evidence-based review. In F1000 Research. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.8460.3

Tollefson, J., & Van Noorden, R. (2022). US government reveals big changes to open-access policy. Nature, 609(7926), 234–235. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-02351-1

Williams et al. (2023). Shifts to open access with high article processing charges hinder research equity and careers. Journal of Biogeography, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.14697

Simard, M.-A., Ghiasi, G., Mongeon, P., & Larivière, V. (2022). National differences in dissemination and use of open access literature. PLOS ONE, 17(8), e0272730. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272730

Vídeos

Cruz, C. H. de B. (2019). FAPESP: política de acesso aberto à ciência em SP. https://iptv.usp.br/portal/video.action?idItem=40510

Dr. Glaucomflecken (2022a, January 21). Academic Journals Doing Crime. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8F9gzQz1Pms

Dr. Glaucomflecken (2022b, February 16). Academic Publishing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ukAkG6c_N4M

Dr. Glaucomflecken (2022c, March 10). Nature Needs a Reviewer. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lt_b4VKBDhI

Dr. Glaucomflecken (2023, May 14). Editors Quit Academic Publishing Company. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hoUGiS1LeKU

Racimo, F. (2023, March 22). PCI Webinar serie - Fernando Racimo - Ethical publishing: How do we get there? - March 2023. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzLgGSNq0Wk

SHB Online (2017, October 5). What is Open Access? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzRgknylTEM

Preprint

Brock, J. (2020). 10 tips for submitting a successful preprint. https://www.natureindex.com/news-blog/tips-how-to-most-successful-preprint-research-science-submission-study

Carneiro et al. (2020). Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 5(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-020-00101-3

Hettne, K., Aardening, R., Gorp, D. van, Hukkelhoven, C., Loorbach, N., Sondervan, J., & Wesenbeeck, A. van. (2021). A Practical Guide to Preprints: Accelerating Scholarly Communication. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5600535

Sever, R. (2023). Preprint review should form part of PhD programmes and postdoc training. Nature, 613(7944), 415–415. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00085-2

Wolf, J. F., MacKay, L., Haworth, S. E., Cossette, M.-L., Dedato, M. N., Young, K. B., Elliott, C. I., & Oomen, R. A. (2021). Preprinting is positively associated with early career researcher status in ecology and evolution. Ecology and Evolution, 11(20), 13624–13632. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8106

Wolf, J., MacKay, L., Haworth, S., Cossette, M.-L., Dedato, M., Young, K., Elliott, C., & Oomen, R. (2021). The early bird uses bioRxiv: The impact of career stage on the usage of preprints in ecology and evolution Preprint. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.22541/au.161818075.53734576/v1

Revisão por pares

Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., & Holcombe, A. O. (2021). A billion-dollar donation: Estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 6(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-021-00118-2

Amaral, O. (2023, May 2). A roupa invisível da revisão por pares. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=waJBLfb0oB8

Mastroianni, A. (2022, December 13). The rise and fall of peer review [Substack newsletter]. Experimental History. https://experimentalhistory.substack.com/p/the-rise-and-fall-of-peer-review

Schroter, S., Black, N., Evans, S., Godlee, F., Osorio, L., & Smith, R. (2008). What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 101(10), 507–514. https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.2008.080062